Major Global Coronary Artery Calcium Guidelines.

This review summarizes the framework behind global guidelines of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment, for applications in both the clinical setting and preventive therapy. By comparing similarities and differences in recommendations, this review identifies most notable common features for the application of CAC presented by different cardiovascular societies across the world. Guidelines included from North America are as follows: 1) the 2019 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease; and 2) the 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia for Prevention of Adult Cardiovascular Disease. The authors also included European guidelines: 1) the 2019 European Society for Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemias; and 2) the 2016 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Clinical Guidelines. In this comparison, the authors also discuss: 1) the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Guidelines on CAC; 2) the Chinese Society of Cardiology Guidelines; and 3) the Japanese Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases. Last, they include statements made by specialty societies including the National Lipid Association, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Utilizing an in-depth review of clinical evidence, these guidelines emphasize the importance of CAC in the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. International guidelines all empower a dynamic clinician-patient relationship and advocate for individualized discussions regarding disease management and pharmacotherapy treatment. Some differences in precise coronary artery calcium score intervals, risk cut points, treatment thresholds, and stratifiers of specific patient subgroups do exist. However, international guidelines employ more similarities than differences from both a clinical and functional perspective. Understanding the parallels among international coronary artery calcium guidelines is essential for clinicians to correctly adjudicate personalized statin and aspirin therapy and further medical management.

De-risking primary prevention: role of imaging.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a common disease among the general population, and includes four major areas: (1) coronary heart disease (CHD), manifested by stable angina, unstable angina, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, and coronary death; (2) cerebrovascular disease, manifested by transient ischemia attack and stroke; (3) peripheral vascular disease, manifested by claudication and critical limb ischemia; and (4) aortic atherosclerosis and aortic aneurysm (thoracic and abdominal). CHD remains the leading cause of death for both men and women in the United States. So, it is imperative to identify people at risk of CHD and provide appropriate medical treatment or intervention to prevent serious complications and outcomes including sudden cardiac death. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is a marker of subclinical coronary artery disease. Therefore, coronary artery calcium score is an important screening method for Coronary artery disease (CAD). In this article, we performed a comprehensive review of current literatures and studies assessing the prognostic value of CAC for future cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library. We also reviewed the 2018 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guideline on the assessment of CVD risk. A CAC score of zero corresponds to very low CVD event rates (∼1% per year) and hence a potent negative risk marker. This has been referred to as the 'power of zero' and affords the lowest risk of any method of risk calculation. It is now indicated in the 2018 ACC/AHA Cholesterol guidelines to be used to avoid statins for 5-10 years after a score of zero, and then re-assess the patient.

Anomalous coronary sinus communication to the left atrium.

This report highlights an unusual anatomical finding with serious implications in clinical cardiac care. We present a case of a fistula or bridging vein originating from the left atrium (LA) and inserting into the coronary sinus (CS) which courses posteriorly to the right atrium and inserts near the superior vena cava, essentially serving as a left to right shunt in a 64-year-old woman presenting with chest pain. The coronary venous system serves as a vital access point in the placement of cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators. Coronary sinus anomalies are rare and often occur in isolation or in association with other vascular anomalies. The described conduit serves as a functional interatrial shunt, though likely with minimal hemodynamic significance given the low pressure state of the left and right atria. This case highlights the importance of understanding the coronary venous anatomy and its variations in terms of anatomic course, valves, diameter, angulation, relationship to coronary arteries. .

Use of Unique Doppler Flow-Pattern for the Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Diverticulum.

Isolated congenital left ventricular diverticulum (LV) is reportedly a rare finding. It is frequently associated with other congenital defects involving heart, pericardium, sternum, diaphragm, and abdominal wall. It is an outpouching from the ventricle and has all three layers of left ventricular free walls. We present the case of a 53-year-old woman who was discovered to have an outpouching of the LV apex on a nongated chest CT scan raising possibility of a pseudoaneurysm. A transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) showed systolic diminution of this outpouching with unique Doppler flow-patterns suggesting a diagnosis of a muscular type of LV diverticulum instead of a postinfarct LV pseudoaneurysm. The patient was reassured and treated conservatively.